[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:59:05 -0400
- In-reply-to: <F30Nrw7Gvslx0fQ3DaE00009f2a@hotmail.com> ("Wayne Steele"'smessage of "Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:51:11 -0700")
- References: <F30Nrw7Gvslx0fQ3DaE00009f2a@hotmail.com>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@hotmail.com> was heard to say:
| My understanding of why SGML was so complicated was acknowledgement of
| this fact. That people wouldn't accept being told what is an
| acceptable delimiter for their semi-structured data and documents.
That's an interesting gloss. I think it probably had more to do with
UI technologies of the day and data input requirements, but I'm not a
historian.
| This also explains why XSLT has been such a successful and widely used
| technology. It embraces this truth, rather than fighting it.
What truth is that? There's nothing variable about the syntax of XSLT.
If you want a template, you type <xsl-prefix:template> and if you want
to select the value of something, you type <xsl-prefix:value-of
select="expression"/>.
| Syntax Matters. People don't want to be told what GIs to use in their XML.
That's clearly true.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Through space the universe grasps me and
XML Standards Architect | swallows me up like a speck; through thought
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | I grasp it.--Pascal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE9myXZOyltUcwYWjsRAolbAJ9T4S+GUYL137kyNgpVG1BU4sS2pACcCUvQ
0fByRhVYd9636FecPQC19A4=
=6r90
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
