xml-dev - RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS

RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@ingr.com>, "'Mike Champion'" <mc@xegesis.org>, "'Dave Winer'" <dave@userland.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS
From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:11:23 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF79F@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
Organization: Propylon
Reply-to: <bill.dehora@propylon.com>



> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com] 
>
> What the web says is not the issue.  It is the 
> inference a court makes because that is where 
> the authority to decide will vest given a dispute.

I don't see what marks out UDDI as something around which you'd
cultivate a legal framework, above and beyond other web mediated
systems.

Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com

References:
- RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS
Next by Date: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS
Previous by thread: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS
Next by thread: RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread