[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> Optional checks worry me. This just adds another point of confusion
> like the one in XML 1.0 with non-deterministic content models, where
> some parsers accept a document and some reject it. If the check is
> optional, it should further be guaranteed to be a non-fatal error,
> even when the check is made.
That is why we say that parsers which do normalization checking must report
to the application, and emphasize that lack of normalization is not a WF
error.
--
Only do what only you can do. John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
--Edsger W. Dijkstra, http://www.reutershealth.com
deceased 6 August 2002 http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
|
