[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 7:58 AM -0400 10/16/02, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>done once at generation time. Apparently normalization checking is
>slightly lighter and as said that check is optional c.f. 2.13 wording.
Optional checks worry me. This just adds another point of confusion
like the one in XML 1.0 with non-deterministic content models, where
some parsers accept a document and some reject it. If the check is
optional, it should further be guaranteed to be a non-fatal error,
even when the check is made.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
