[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
dbox@microsoft.com (Don Box) writes:
>> Hmm ... so what did you _actually_ say? I'm having a hard time
>> working back from what Kurt reported to anything plausible.
>
>1) Sending/processing SOAP messages independent from transport is
>interesting - and WS-Routing and WS-Security help, especially in the
>face of SOAP intermediaries.
That sounds less ambitious than what Kurt described, but I can't really
say it makes me question the rest of his description.
>2) A lot of interesting XML apps never see XML 1.0, only infosets. This
>is widespread practice for in-memory scenarios today. Whether this
>practice becomes commonplace across memory/host boundaries in a
>heterogeneous environment is an open question.
>
>3) Type assignment (a la PSVI) solves some interesting problems.
Nasty stuff, that, but again, not different from what I read yesterday.
-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
