xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??

Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Ian Tindale <iandeli@clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:30:19 +0200
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <MABBLFFBAGDONBKFHNFLOEAMDBAA.hchatfield@urbanmarket.com> <200210181621.15396.iandeli@clara.co.uk> <200210181648.13284.iandeli@clara.co.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Ian Tindale wrote:
> In fact, what's the difference between storing cached FO docs and storing 
> final PDF docs, in that case?Ian Tindale wrote:
> In fact, what's the difference between storing cached FO docs and storing 
> final PDF docs, in that case?

People rarely load PDF documents into plain text editors to see what's in
them. And they become *really* upset if the Acrobat Reader they have
installed pops up a small dialog box stating a version problem instead of
displaying some nicely formatted pages.

J.Pietschmann

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
  - From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@urbanmarket.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
  - From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@clara.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
  - From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@clara.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread