[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 15:20, John Cowan wrote:
> What was a question of justice was to get the "new" scripts into the
> XML standard. Implementation of it by any particular system is a local
> question which should be answered according to local needs. Adding
> the new name characters avoids the "usable xor standard" dilemma; adding
> the newline conventions avoids the "well-formed xor plaintext" dilemma.
The first one being the Ethiopian XML Interest Group and the second one
IBM finding themselves together in the XML 1.1 boat for different
reasons?
> People who do not need XML 1.1 need not worry about it until their business
> partners start to send it. Then they should find plenty of tools available.
My first analysis wasn't that wrong, then, even though that's becoming
clearer!
Thanks
Eric
--
Did you know it? Python has now a Relax NG (partial) implementation.
http://advogato.org/proj/xvif/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
