[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I need both:Speed and validation!But I need also documentation and reliability... maybe I'm asking the moon :-), but someone can help me to arrive closer (to the moon)!
Thank you and best
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Karl Waclawek [mailto:karl@waclawek.net]
Inviato: marted́ 22 ottobre 2002 17.05
A: Enrico Prosperi; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Oggetto: Re: [xml-dev] Comparison between SAX parser
What are your needs? Speed? Validation?
For speed SAXinC++ (based on Expat) is likely one of the best choices,
but it does not validate.
Karl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Enrico Prosperi" <enrico.prosperi@address.it>
To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:49 AM
Subject: [xml-dev] Comparison between SAX parser
Dear Sirs,
I need to develop a C++ application that will use a SAX parser. I have seen that there are a lot of
implementation of SAX Parser (SAXinC++, Xerces. MicrosoftSAX, Oracle, etc...). Is there anyone that
can help me to decide what is the best (loking at performance, documentation, stability etc...).
I'll develop for win32. Any suggest will be very appreciate! If anyone knows other implementations
that I didn't mention, please tell me!
Thank you in advance and
Best Regards
Enrico Prosperi
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
