xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)

Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:27:09 -0700
Cc: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <200210241309.JAA04568@mail2.reutershealth.com>
References: <200210241309.JAA04568@mail2.reutershealth.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

John Cowan wrote:

> But not because he was a fool.  I didn't use this quote because I think
> it's off the point: the trouble is that it is hard to think of someone
> who 1) is uncontroversially a fool of the relevant kind and 2) is 
> well-known.

Pons & Fleischman?

> The fate of fools is obscurity.

Eventually. -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)
  - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread