xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking

Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: mc@xegesis.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <5b.3043f0cb.2ae95327@aol.com> from "AndrewWatt2000@aol.com" at Oct 24, 2002 09:44:07 AM

AndrewWatt2000@aol.com scripsit:

> From this part of your response I assume that you are not familiar with the 
> idiomatic meaning of "lose the plot" in British English?
> 
> It doesn't have the sense that you seem to imagine it might.

Time to enlighten the benighted Yanks, Andrew, including me.

-- 
Only do what only you can do.           John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
  --Edsger W. Dijkstra,                 http://www.reutershealth.com
    deceased 6 August 2002              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
  - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F or?)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread