OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] Article: "The horror of XML"

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Richard Tobin wrote:

> But if spec writers want it, they can always require an infoset
> corresponding to a well-formed XML document.
>
> If there was demand for it, the Infoset could be amended to include a
> definition of a "well-formed infoset", or something like that.

Well-formedness is a condition defined by lexical constraints, as in the
XML 1.0 Recommendation. The Infoset is distinguished from XML 1.0
precisely in that it takes an information-first view of XML entities, as
specifically contrasted with the lexical view of the Rec. As the tests
for well-formedness would be lexical, and applicable specifically to a
document rather than to a set of information items, definition of a
"well-formed infoset" would seem to fall between the stools of
'well-formed' and 'infoset'.

Respectfully,

Walter Perry






 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS