[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> The UTC's position on jnodot is that there's no evidence that it's actually
> used as a *character* anywhere, as opposed to a glyph fragment used to
> construct various kinds of accented j's.
\hat{\imath + \jmath} = \hat{\imath} + \hat{jmath}
Although this really misses the point. Unicode contains several
characters that are explictly there to round trip other formats.
Given the importance today to map documents coded in
SGML+SDATA-entities
to
XML+Unicode character data
I find it frankly astonishing that Unicode 3 didn't take
as a _requirement_ that it support all the characters that had ISO
entity definitions.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
