[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Miles Sabin wrote:
> ...
>
> I prefer the other option too.
>
> But it's not clear to me what this has to do with RDF or DAML. Once
> you've defined a mapping between the vocabularies (and if you want to
> get fancy, between the choreographies too), and what useful job is
> there left for assertions and reasoners to do?
I would define the mapping _as_ a RDF/DAML(OWL) assertion using DAML's
(OWL's) equivalentTo relationship.
Paul Prescod
|