[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Paul Prescod wrote,
> Miles Sabin wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I prefer the other option too.
> >
> > But it's not clear to me what this has to do with RDF or DAML. Once
> > you've defined a mapping between the vocabularies (and if you want
> > to get fancy, between the choreographies too), and what useful job
> > is there left for assertions and reasoners to do?
>
> I would define the mapping _as_ a RDF/DAML(OWL) assertion using
> DAML's (OWL's) equivalentTo relationship.
Maybe I should have said transformation rather than mapping.
I'll try again: once you've defined an executable transformation (eg.
using XSLT), what useful job is there left for RDF/DAML/OWL to do?
Cheers,
Miles
|
