Lists Home |
Date Index |
Miles Sabin wrote:
> Not quite. I'm saying that vocabulary to vocabulary mappings can be
> expressed in XSLT as well as in OWL, and I'm suggesting that for many
> practical purposes XSLT is likely to be a better bet.
I don't think that anybody is claiming that OWL should replace XSLT.
Rather that OWL is better when OWL's features are a better fit and XSLT
is better in the opposite situation. We've talked at length about the
strengths and weaknesses of both already.