RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness

[Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>]

> >Sadly, my prediction that no-one would ever use XML Namespaces because
> >the whole idea was so unworkable is one of many occasions on which I

I don't think I understand what the alternative is.  Is it this?
    Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type
    attributes that have URI(s) describing the element?

If that's it, why is that better?  Aliasing?

If that's not it, what is it?
        /r$