[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> The logic of this decision is as follows:
>
> 1) schemes are going to be popular (Simon himself has already
> defined several);
> 2) short scheme names are likely to collide;
> 3) collision is an interop nightmare;
> 4) scheme names therefore need to incorporate domain names in some way;
4 doesn't follow. How about:
4') scheme names therefore need to be unique in some way
Bill de hÓra
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com
|