xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is

Re: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: roger.day@globalgraphics.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:23:56 -0500 (EST)
Cc: danny666@virgilio.it (Danny Ayers), donpark@docuverse.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <80256C76.003AF18F.00@notescam.cam.harlequin.co.uk> from "roger.day@globalgraphics.com" at Nov 19, 2002 10:43:47 AM

roger.day@globalgraphics.com scripsit:

> the only app I've seen using RDF is Mozilla, but I lead a sheltered life. Can
> you cite me some others, please?

dmoz.org.

All the RSS 1.0 feeds out there.

Reuters Health.

-- 
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is hard )
  - From: roger.day@globalgraphics.com

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is hard )
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is hard )
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] The perils of P18S (was Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is hard )
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread