Lists Home |
Date Index |
"Jonathan Borden" <email@example.com> writes:
> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > Does this mean that RDDL2 documents are _not_ XHTML? This seems a
> > backward step to me -- one of the things I _really_ like about RDDL is
> > that when you point a browser at a namespace name which points to an
> > RDDL doc, something sensible happens.
> Most certainly not. http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2 proposes XHTML+RDF formats
> (its just a proposal and not yet in final form). I've also shown
> http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2-example.html which is an RDF/XML document (not
> XHTML despite its extension) that *does* display in a browser -- I doubt
> that we'd pick this (pure RDF/XML) format for RDDL2, instead go with a XHTML
> + RDF hybrid.
Thanks, I'm reassured.
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]