xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Subject: Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:26:31 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <r01050400-1022-937B84E7FC9311D696190003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

simonstl@simonstl.com (Simon St.Laurent) writes:
>XML instead of XHTML

That should be "XML instead of HTML".  XHTML didn't exist at the start
of the time I was writing about, and XHTML is still only getting
started.

Maybe the world needs a Society for Creative Acronym Anachronism, but
that's awfully hard to say.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces and XML Schema validation
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread