|
|
Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
|
[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In a message dated 20/11/2002 16:43:15 GMT Standard Time, clbullar@ingr.com writes:
Andrew:
1. Does XHTML 2.0 have a future? Yes. For those who believe in and
want to pursue development of the Universal Interface Virtual Machine (UIVM)
as Paul calls it, a native language for that machine is needed.
Len,
Is
http://www.blogstream.com/pauls/1034787029
the fullest development of that idea?
Although it seems to have been less than obvious to a few on this list I am actually trying to explore what I see as a serious issue.
Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement yesterday's technology tomorrow"
|
|
|
|
|
|