[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I hope you and other members of
the HTML [sic] Working Group will be able to find some arguments in support of
XHTML 2.0.
Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its
full potential ... to implement yesterday's technology
tomorrow"
---
What you
clearly don't understand is that no one, myself, members of the HTML Working
Group, any other working group, any other individual or organization, is
required, honor bound, or in any other way should be motivated to respond
to your demands for "justification" or arguments simply because you posted an
email message.
As Uche so
clearly pointed out, you seem to have no other purpose but to sit
and poke at the work of others, without providing anything substantive of
your own. You do not have the right to demand the ability to waste other
people's time.
Contribute in a meaningful
way, which I've yet to ever see, and you may end up in dialog with the people
you are trying to engage. Otherwise, you'll likely end up on a growing list of
twit filters.
Ann
|
