[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:
> That tends to support my viewpoint that it is not axiomatic that further
> development of XHTML is a wise use of limited W3C resources.
What resources in particular are you concerned about? If the editors of
XHTML 2.0 were not working on XHTML 2.0, they might spend their time at
the pub or in the hot-tub. That wouldn't advance the Web.
Paul Prescod
|