OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Probably one should note that most of the people 
working on the XHTML projects and other WGs are
volunteers. Either they or their companies 
are paying for their time and contributions.  
My guess is that other than review and approval, 
the W3C is mainly fulfilling administrative functions. 
So as long as there is member interest expressed 
by the sign up sheet and fulfillment of assignments, 
there is no scarcity of resources in this case.

... now about that hot tub.  It is where?  Near 
the pub?


From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net]

AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:

> That tends to support my viewpoint that it is not axiomatic that further
> development of XHTML is a wise use of limited W3C resources.

What resources in particular are you concerned about? If the editors of 
XHTML 2.0 were not working on XHTML 2.0, they might spend their time at 
the pub or in the hot-tub. That wouldn't advance the Web.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS