[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Since when was XSLT lexical driven? As for XQuery, there already is an
XQuery Basic conformance level [which in my personal opinion is the only
sane conformance level] which satisfies most of the rants I've seen
today.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Let sleeping dogs lie, unless they snore.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: Jonathan Robie
> Cc: Sean McGrath; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>
> I think the two sides could probably come to some kind of
> armistice if XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery were cleanly
> separated into lexical and type-driven profiles.
>
> Paul Prescod
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
|
