[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Typing and paranoia
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:44:36 -0800
- Cc: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcKdNP59j7t9MceLTtiWxgzdDm0HnAAALxy4
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Typing and paranoia
Oh, you were saying that XML Schema uses XML 1.0 syntax? That doesn't seem like a big deal given the hundreds of markup dialects built with XML. I meant that W3C XML Schema describes how to constrain an XML Infoset not a document written using the XML 1.0 syntax.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
Sent: Fri 12/6/2002 6:37 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Cc: XML Dev
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Typing and paranoia
Then why does it have a DTD?
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com]
I'm not getting into this debate but just want to point out that W3C XML
Schema is defined in terms of the Infoset not the XML 1.0 syntax.
|
