[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
dareo@microsoft.com (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
>The XML in this example isn't as perverse (i.e boneheaded) as in your
>original claims.
Is it a markup style you would recommend? "Isn't as perverse" sounds
pretty seriously hedged.
> Even then I only see two answers
>
>A.) recursively filter for only the items you care about (my stylesheet
>and query examples)
>
>B.) process XML based on agreed upon processing rules
>
>Trying to come up with a "generic" mechanism for processing XML in such
>situations seems like a fools errand.
That sounds to me like a point against creating this kind of XML.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
