Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 06:16:34 -0800, Dare Obasanjo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Mike, We have a bug which caused the behavior Doug Ransom saw. Please do
> not treat a bug in one of our implementations of an XML parser as
> indicative of any imagined Microsoft position towards the W3C XML 1.0
I have come to understand in the course of this thread that the original
point was about a bug rather than a feature Thanks for the clarification.
What about the assertion that the some extra setup is needed to parse
entities? Is that my misunderstanding of the "bug" or a "feature"?
But once again, I don't want to tie my argument here to what MS does or
does not do, nor to malign them by association with a position that is