Lists Home |
Date Index |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
/ "Mike Plusch" <email@example.com> was heard to say:
| XML does not have to be verbose in the future.
The verbosity of XML is one of it's strengths.
| It _could_ be suitable for ALL applications.
| It is desirable to have a common, standard syntax
| that can be used for ALL purposes.
That's just silly. Nothing is suitable for all purposes. The language
you describe is less suitable for many of the purposes I have in mind
for precisely the reasons that it's more suitable to the purposes you
have in mind.
Be seeing you,
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Reality is what refuses to go away when I
XML Standards Architect | stop believing in it.--Philip K. Dick
Web Tech. and Standards |
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----