[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Ok. That makes sense. The model is the selector and
there can be many selectors (I know that is not official
terminology but I am comfortable with that).
Then, the IETF 2396 spec can't formally map to RDF.
It has terms which have no equivalents. It is as if the
authors should have separated the syntax specification for
creating the URI from any spec for a means of using it
as an identifier in a process of separately specified
identification.
Another example of doing less is more?
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Miles Sabin [mailto:miles@milessabin.com]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote,
> Still, none of that fixes the RDF problem which as I understand it,
> and correct me if I am wrong, demands a one to one mapping.
Only in a specific context, as specified by a model. But there can be
many models, so there's no unique fixed referent to be denoted across
all contexts, so no role for an abstract Resource.
|
