[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote,
> Ok. That makes sense. The model is the selector and there can be
> many selectors (I know that is not official terminology but I am
> comfortable with that).
>
> Then, the IETF 2396 spec can't formally map to RDF. It has terms which
> have no equivalents.
That's right IMO.
> It is as if the authors should have separated the syntax specification
> for creating the URI from any spec for a means of using it as an
> identifier in a process of separately specified identification.
Well, they tried. After all the title is "Uniform Resource Identifiers:
Generic *Syntax*". But somehow or other a couple of paras of something
else crept in and have been causing trouble ever since. If they were
just snipped out it'd be no great loss.
> Another example of doing less is more?
Could be ...
Cheers,
Miles
|
