[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
clbullar@ingr.com (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>>Wow. I can't believe we got this far this quickly, with so little
>>dissent.
>
>Practice.
I like that idea, but have to wonder a bit, as the last 24 hours on
www-tag have been very different. For example, someone with much more
practice brushed off Bill's post:
"an essential [axiom] was that the same URI represents the same thing
irrespective of context."
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0330.html
And then there's this case of two well-practiced people who seem to
disagree rather strongly:
"Some of your terms are vague, but here I think I can say they are just
wrong. "
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0334.html
I like this explanation, personally:
"I noticed that every veteran of 2396 I come across seemed to have
certain behaviors best explained as post-traumatic disorders....."
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0337.html
Too much discussion of URIs does seem to have a corrosive effect on my
personality, but it's also oddly addictive. I think I'd better contact
the DEA about this problem, as I don't appear to be the only person
encountering it.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
