Lists Home |
Date Index |
email@example.com (John Cowan) writes:
>Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
>The RESTafarian Way seems to be this: a URI allows you to specify what
>you want a representation of, and other means (your "adjectives") allow
>you to specify how you want it. The nasty part comes when you use URIs
>to specify what you are talking about, since "what you are talking
>about" is sometimes a subject matter, sometimes a representation
Yes. That's a good simple explanation of the problems with URIs as they
are commonly used.
>> I am:
>So *that's* who you are, eh? I never woulda guessed it.
Yeah, that's probably my dominant XML-related personality, anyway, the
best reflection of what I want to do with this stuff personally. A
couple of other personalities are listed at the bottom of the message.
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:184.108.40.206.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether