[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
it was an offhand remark. despite that, in fact, "namespace scope issues" arise from problems with how "namespaces in xml" is implemented, and are not entailed
by the semantics of "namespace scope" and/or "prefix - namespace binding".
...
Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> If by this you mean that bugs cannot be in specifications, but rather
> only the implementations of the specifications, then I respectfully
> disagree.
>
> Joe Chiusano
> Booz | Allen | Hamilton
>
> james anderson wrote:
> >
> > bugs are in implementations.
> >
> > "Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> > >
> > > chiusano_joseph@bah.com (Chiusano Joseph) writes:
> > > >(1) What are "namespace scope issues"? Namespace scoping is a very
> > > >useful feature, similar to scoping of variables.
> > >
> > > Wow. I haven't been able to say "it's a feature not a bug" in a while.
> > > Of course, that statement's being useful here suggests that there's an
> > > enormous amount of bugginess and sheer aggravation in that "feature".
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
