[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
james.anderson@setf.de (james anderson) writes:
>it was an offhand remark. despite that, in fact, "namespace scope
>issues" arise from problems with how "namespaces in xml" is
>implemented, and are not entailed by the semantics of "namespace
>scope" and/or "prefix - namespace binding".
Actually, no - I see "namespace scope issues" as a monkeywrench thrown
into the heart of XML, causing at least as many problems as they
purportedly solve. Definitely enough cause to be sarcastic about "it's
a feature not a bug."
I'll talk more about working around these "features" at XML Europe.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
