[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Ok, I'll byte. In C/C++, 2b is neither an identifier nor a constant. But then
if (0x2b & !0x2b) {
doesn't read as smoothly.
The & is a bitwise operator, whereas ! is a logical NOT. Did you mean
if (0x2b & ~0x2b) {
or
if (0x2b && !0x2b) {
Either way it comes out false.
Why stop there? Doesn't XML enable far deeper levels of convolution?
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "doc.dtd">
<doc>
<para>Hello World</para>
</doc>
<!ELEMENT doc (para)+>
<!ELEMENT para (#PCDATA)>
<xsl:stylesheet
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
version="1.0">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="para">
<xsl:apply-templates/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Niels Peter Strandberg wrote:
> Can you find the bug? The price is Helsingør castle!
>
>
> On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 04:28 PM, Niels Peter Strandberg wrote:
>
>> ============================
>> HAMLET
>> ============================
>>
>> if (2b & !2b) {
>> out("That is the question!");
>> }
>>
>>
>> From a dane (!prince), Niels Peter
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 10:58 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
>>
>>> I once saw a version that added:
>>>
>>> ======================================================
>>> Ex-programmer who has been promoted to project manager
>>> ======================================================
>>>
>>> "Write me a program that says 'Hello World'"
>>>
>>> ==========================================
>>> Ex-programmer who has been promoted to CEO
>>> ==========================================
>>>
>>> "What is the business benefit of all this code we are writing?"
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Kay
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jonathan Robie
>>>> [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com]
>>>> Sent: 12 March 2003 18:35
>>>> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>>>> Subject: [xml-dev] Off Topic: Evolution of a Programmer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This was forwarded to me - I have no idea where it came from
>>>> originally.
>>>>
[snip!]
|
