[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
the problematic line is, in fact, that which was included in the original message.
a conformant namespace processor cannot classify the cited document as
wellformed, as the two attributes with qualified names n1:a and n2:a denote
the same universal name. perhaps MS net explorer 6.0 has a "no namespaces"
fallback mode?
Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> Jimmy,
>
> The snippet below is actually missing a line, so without that missing
> line it is legal. The full snippet from the Namespaces in XML
> recommendation is:
>
> <!-- http://www.w3.org is bound to n1 and n2 -->
> <x xmlns:n1="http://www.w3.org";
> xmlns:n2="http://www.w3.org"; >
> <bad a="1" a="2" />
> <bad n1:a="1" n2:a="2" />
> </x>
>
> Try this one and see what you get.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Joe Chiusano
> Booz | Allen | Hamilton
>
> > zhengyu wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I was reading XML namespace doc 14/Jan/99 version. One of the
> > snippets that is supposed to be illegal seems OK with MS net explorer
> > 6.0. It is shown below, and the bad element is named "bad."
> >
> > <!-- http://www.w3.org is bound to n1 and n2 -->
strictly speaking, both n1 and n2 are bound to "http://www.w3.org";
> > <x xmlns:n1="http://www.w3.org";
> > xmlns:n2="http://www.w3.org"; >
> > <bad n1:a="1" n2:a="2" />
> > </x>
> >
> > Do any microsoft people have any explanation for this?
> >
> > Jimmy
>
...
|
