[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
tbray@textuality.com (Tim Bray) writes:
>> The URN business is silly, but heck, it's a namespace URI. Not like
>> you're supposed to _do_ anything with it, right?
>
>Er actually I'm not sure it really is a URI as in conforming to the
>appropriate RFCs - I'm not a URN expert but I really thought you were
>supposed to register your namespace before starting to grind URNs out
>to the world. So no, I don't think this is acceptable.
Given the responses I've had, I guess I should have put a smiley on that
- I was joking.
Given that no XML processor I've used on this has so much as giggled,
maybe there's a more serious general issue involving URIs and
namespaces, but that seems like permathread territory.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
