Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Thursday 20 March 2003 11:44, John Cowan wrote:
> > > So a
> > > date has to be involved, and IMHO should be involved in *every*
> > > namespace name, whether URL or URN, where the DNS is being relied on at
> > > all.
> > That's moving towards a 'big ugly number' scheme [...] .
> But not very far. Dates (or in fact year numbers) are sufficient to
> disambiguate name-rental situations like DNS.
Yes, I think you're right :-)
Ok! Does anyone fancy writing a URN proposal RFC? Or shall I try to fit it
into my busy schedule?
urn:dn:... might be a bit nicer to type, of course.
A city is like a large, complex, rabbit