Lists Home |
Date Index |
> [Again, please trim replies.]
> firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill de hÓra) writes:
> >It would be worth firing up a copy of Oo for a side by side comparison.
> That's a bit of a challenge. Oo didn't like opening the Word .doc file
> that included the extra markup, and it discarded the graphic and it's
> associated VML. Oo also stores the XML information in multiple files
> rather than in one file (or multiple files inside of zip, anyway.)
> Here are the four pieces, minus the manifest. The content.xml file,
> probably the one people are most interested in, is first.
Hmm. I've examined OOo saved filed for docs I edited from scratch, and
they're usually much simpler than this. Maybe the import from Word mode also
kicks in an "import inscrutable XML generator" feature? :-)
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Universal Business Language (UBL) - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/l
EXSLT by example - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-exslt.html
The worry about program wizards - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7238
Use rdf:about and rdf:ID effectively in RDF/XML - http://www-106.ibm.com/develo
Keep context straight in XSLT - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra
Python Generators + DOM - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/01/08/py-xml.html
Using SAX for Proper XML Output - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/12/py-xml.ht
SAX filters for flexible processing - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml