[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
martin@hack.org writes:
>On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
>> BEEP did a much nicer job with this stuff, using XML for both headers
>> and (sometimes) content, but keeping them in separate documents.
They
>> demonstrated that XML can useful for protocols work but that you
don't
>> need to confuse XML documents with messages.
>
>sort of like ebXML then? or any SOAP implementation with the payload
>separate from the envelope.
I believe so. Separate payloads in SOAP still appear to be the
exception, not the rule.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
