[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Nonetheless, regex is perfectly suitable for parsing XML in narrow,
> provincial, tightly constrained and content-controlled circumstances.
ROTFL. If Tim had written that at first, rather than what he did write, I'd
guess this thread would never even have had legs. I, for sure, would not have
been interested in arguing a truism.
Funny thing, though, that I have in my career encountered so few narrow,
provincial, tightly constrained and content-controlled circumstances. Must be
just my lousy luck.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Use internal references in XML vocabularies - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipvocab.html
Universal Business Language (UBL) - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think16.html
EXSLT by example - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-exslt.html
The worry about program wizards - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7238
Use rdf:about and rdf:ID effectively in RDF/XML - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tiprdfai.html
Keep context straight in XSLT - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipcurrent.html
Using SAX for Proper XML Output - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/12/py-xml.html
SAX filters for flexible processing - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipsaxflex.html
|
