Lists Home |
Date Index |
> Maybe the requirement is to support NDATA. I get a lot
> of inquiries about stuffing jpegs, etc, inline. When
> I show them the limited means, I get frowns. Perhaps
> it is time to revisit that permathread.
One could prefix such an NDATA section with a length tag,
allowing the parser to simply ignore the next "length" bytes.
That essentially takes the NDATA section out of XML land.
Only drawback: regular text editors have problems with binary data.