RE: [xml-dev] Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Thanks.  I can nail that to the wall next to the 
"it's only a syntax" rule that gets broken every 
time a programming team needs a data model.  Given 
a berm, they will burrow.

len

From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]

clbullar@ingr.com (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Why not NDATA?

I think Rick Jelliffe covered this last week better than I ever will.

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200303/msg00739.html