[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Mmmhh... very interesting. Then I picture the NDATA section something like
this:
<?xml version="2.0"?>
<root>
<![CDATA[ text ]]>
<xml:NDATA length="12" dimensional="b">|°¬~*%_@¨¨\´#á!¬^¡?</xml:NDATA>
<!-- The length would be in bits(b), bytes(B), kilo bytes(KB), etc. -->
</root>
Best!
-Sergio
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Waclawek
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Sent: 2/04/2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] CDATA
> Maybe the requirement is to support NDATA. I get a lot
> of inquiries about stuffing jpegs, etc, inline. When
> I show them the limited means, I get frowns. Perhaps
> it is time to revisit that permathread.
One could prefix such an NDATA section with a length tag,
allowing the parser to simply ignore the next "length" bytes.
That essentially takes the NDATA section out of XML land.
Only drawback: regular text editors have problems with binary data.
Karl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
