xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces

Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:01:38 -0700
Cc: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@ingr.com>, XML Dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7CAAE@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7CAAE@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> ...  The authors seem to be accepting the transcience of URLs
 > [which the W3C TAG likes to pretend doesn't exist]

While we are on the subject of Koans, a question has been troubling me 
master: how can one string be more transient than another?

  Paul Prescod

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
  - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread