[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Arg, why is it that xml-dev is the only mailing list that I use that
> requires a "reply to all" to get a copy to the list? Other lists seem to
> work in the exact opposite fashion of xml-dev...
Not for me. I'm on 34 mailing lists (yes, it's crazy, and so often I have to
mass delete one or another). Only two of them have the annoying behavior of
munging the reply-to. Most act as XML-DEV does in that regard, thank goodness.
The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed flame-war
starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV does this rightly,
regardless of other technical issues.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Gems From the [Python/XML] Archives - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/04/09/py-xm
l.html
Introducing N-Triples - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi
nk17/index.html
Use internal references in XML vocabularies - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerw
orks/xml/library/x-tipvocab.html
EXSLT by example - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-exslt.html
The worry about program wizards - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7238
Use rdf:about and rdf:ID effectively in RDF/XML - http://www-106.ibm.com/develo
perworks/xml/library/x-tiprdfai.html
|
