xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging

Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:21:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <E196YBa-0000bG-00@borgia.local>

uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com (Uche Ogbuji) writes:
>The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed
>flame-war starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV does
>this rightly, regardless of other technical issues.

And I agree with Uche on this point, adding that I wish more people
would trim the recipients list when they reply.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>

References:
- Reply-to munging
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>

Prev by Date: Reply-to munging
Next by Date: RE: FW: [xml-dev] ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntacti cRig or Mortis"
Previous by thread: Reply-to munging
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread