Lists Home |
Date Index |
Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I have no problem with the "munging" of the "reply to".
> That is indeed
> > how I expect a mailing list to work. What I've been seeing is that
> > I've got to do a "reply to all" to get things to the list
> instead of a
> > simple "reply".
> From my reading of Simon's and Joe's messages, the three of
> us know that's
> what you mean. And we disagree with you that it's a bad
> thing to have to use
> reply-to-all. From what you say it seems that the other
> lists you frequent
> use reply-to munging. I think that's nasty, and I gather
> many others agree
> with me. To be fair, there are prople who swear by it, and
> that's why I said
> it's such a flammable topic.
I've been using mailing lists off and on for some 20 years now and this is
the first one I've encountered that behaves this way. Personally, I find it
a pain that dialogue by default is "off list", maybe I'm just too used to
"open source" mind sets (where off list is a bad thing)...