xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?

Re: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?
From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:48:49 -0700
In-reply-to: <20030419065948.L18010@redhat.com>
References: <20030419065948.L18010@redhat.com> <E196lKL-0001Uj-00@borgia.local> <02d301c30646$b3ddc9c0$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com>

Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
>   Personally I think SAX makes a terribly bad API for programmers, [...]

I agree, but I don't think the DOM is a whole lot better either :-)

Both are best used as a foundation for higher-level interfaces
that match the problem at hand.

--Joe English

  jenglish@flightlab.com

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?
  - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis"
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Does SAX make sense?
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] What is the data here?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS